11/3/2008 3:32 AM
What's Up With That?: Art of the temporary variety
This article has been read 1165 times.
By Harry Funk, Online editor
hfunk@observer-reporter.com
Everyone knows what art is.
It hangs in galleries, behind velvet ropes and in ornate frames, for aficionados to enjoy for generations to come.
Rate This Story:
1 the lowest - 5 the highest
Current rating:
Sure, that's the way you learned it in school: da Vinci and Rembrandt, Manet and Monet, van Gogh and van Dyck. Art for the ages.
But what about that dragon you drew in fourth grade? That was art, at least until your mother took it off the refrigerator and tossed it into the trash.
More specifically, that was disposable art, even though you didn't intend it to be temporary.
Some artists do. To them, art is for the moment, not for posterity.
You see and hear temporary art in a variety of places, be it a spray-painted graffito that will be glossed over by the public works department, or a couple of guys playing guitar without a tape recorder running.
You even smell and taste it: Master chefs create culinary masterpieces, knowing full well that they'll end up in a series of stomachs.
Sometimes art reaches none of the senses. The late composer John Cage wrote a piece called "4'33," which is literally four minutes and 33 seconds of silence.
In the opinion of many a layman, that's the definition of disposable.
Temporary art can touch a spiritual side. Washington & Jefferson College recently hosted a group of Buddhist monks from the Gaden Shartse Monastery in India, men who spent four days working on a mandala, an intricately detailed sculpture of sand.
Then they swept it all away.
0 comments
All comments will be reviewed by administrators and posted to their respective articles within 24 hours. Comments deemed inappropriate will not be posted.