close

OP-ED: The myth of Democratic Socialism

6 min read
article image -

As the political season continues, progressives are trying to sell the false narrative that Democratic Socialism is not really socialism. It is somehow different and better. That is subterfuge and demonstrably not true.

The purveyors of socialism have tried to rebrand their product by calling it “Democratic Socialism.” The sales force and marketing department of Democratic Socialism, a large portion of the Democratic Party, many in Hollywood and many in the media, are plying their myth that Democratic Socialism is nothing like socialism. Be very clear. Democratic Socialism is not the fairy tale wonderland of inclusiveness, social justice, equality and “free stuff” it is advertised to be. It will not end human exploitation, and it will not save the planet. It is still socialism, just with a new name. Socialism has never worked for any nation, and it will not work in this country, even with a new name.

Look at the policies proposed by the current advocates of Democratic Socialism and we see that they are just repackaged socialism.

The current frontrunner in the Democratic stampede, Sen. Bernie Sanders, is an unabashed advocate of socialism, so let’s see what he has to say. One could just as easily substitute most of the other candidates because their platforms are similar.

Sanders proposes, for example, to completely wipe out the natural gas, coal and oil industries. In their place, he would create a government-owned electric company to produce wind, solar and geothermal energy. Overlooking for the moment that the proposal is technically absurd, creating a government monopoly producer is the very definition of socialism.

Sanders proposes to spend $16.3 trillion on his Green New Deal, which is supposed to address a concern that has yet to be proven using means that demonstrate no proof of positive effect. That money will come from massive redistribution of wealth, another definition of socialism.

Sanders proposes to provide free health care to all as well as free college. This is the government exerting massive control over the lives of its subjects, at massive cost, through centralized government control. Again, classic socialism.

The list goes on with proposals that will require everything from rebuilding homes and huge government-owned housing projects to dictating how farming will occur. The program includes “breaking up” big businesses, prosecuting banks, businesses and executives for “past crimes against the environment,” and dictating the car you can drive. This is socialism heading toward communism.

Many, if not most, of the programs find their basis in identity politics. Previous socialists promoted class warfare between the haves and have-nots. Today’s identity politics speaks of race and gender as the basis of public policy. The bad guys in old-time socialism were capitalists. The battle now is with privileged white males. However you slice it, it still features class warfare and is still socialism.

Democratic Socialism is pledged to bring about race and gender equality, income equality and general goodness. Individual liberties, private property and the concept of a competitive market will not be surrendered willingly. To achieve this, the new socialism will have to be just as authoritarian as the old socialism. History shows that when one group attempts to take goods and freedoms away from another to redistribute to favored groups, dissension occurs. Who gets what? Who gets the best land, the best houses, the best jobs, the best medical treatment? Who will be favored to supply the solar panels and wind turbines? The list goes on.

When a free market no longer allocates production and consumption or determines level of reward for effort, a central control must do this and, chaos, inefficiency and a state of war are sure to follow. This is where Democratic Socialism will go because it is nothing more than socialism, and we have a great deal of historical precedent to see how it works.

The current crop of apologists for Democratic Socialism love to point their listeners to the “Nordic Model” of Democratic Socialism as they allege is practiced in countries like Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Finland. They love to point to the economic success of Norway as proof positive that Democratic Socialism works. Unfortunately for the purveyors, Norway’s economic success derives mostly from abundant natural resources and its success and well-being predates its venture toward socialism. Norway does control its oil industry, but most other businesses have limited government involvement. In fact, most Nordic nations are moving away from socialism. Norway and Denmark deny they are socialist and describe themselves as “free market” economies. Many state-owned businesses have been privatized. In 2012, Sweden topped privatization initiatives globally. Many of the welfare systems are being cut back. Why is this happening? Because the shortcomings of Democratic Socialism are becoming more apparent.

What are the shortcomings of the Nordic Democratic Socialist system? Exactly what history always finds. First and foremost, taxes are astronomical, running as high as 60%. People want freedom to control their own lives, work where they want to work and buy what they wish. Because there is little or no economic incentive, innovation becomes rare and few new ideas and products appear. With the need for government regulation and control, bureaucracies grow, and this is non-productive labor. There is no reward to produce more when people have their individual needs met so they often give up and leave the workforce, increasing costs even more. The people of Norway and other countries are choosing to leave this behind and return to market capitalism or, maybe as they term it, compassionate capitalism.

Where then is the real danger? Not in our current form of government but clearly in abandoning it and adapting socialism by whatever name the Democrats choose to call it.

Ask yourself, how would you benefit from giving up what you have to adapt the servitude of socialism? Why would you want to adapt what others who have tried it are abandoning?

As is attributed to Winston Churchill, “Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others.”

Dave Ball is a Peters Township councilman and vice chairman of the Republican Party of Washington County.

CUSTOMER LOGIN

If you have an account and are registered for online access, sign in with your email address and password below.

NEW CUSTOMERS/UNREGISTERED ACCOUNTS

Never been a subscriber and want to subscribe, click the Subscribe button below.

Starting at $3.75/week.

Subscribe Today