close

EDITORIAL: State should ban hand-held phones while driving

3 min read

The pilot program allowing the use of speed cameras in active work zones in the Philadelphia area, in effect since its approval under Act 86 of 2018, will be expiring this year unless the Pennsylvania General Assembly makes the program permanent.

A recent Capitolwire article reported that state Rep. Ed Neilson, D-Philadelphia, is planning legislation that not only would continue the Philadelphia-area program, but expand it.

The problem is that the proposed expansion is too limited. What Neilson, chairman of the House Transportation Committee, wants to do should be authorized for major highways statewide, realizing, of course, that it might take a year or so before the statewide expansion would be fully operational.

There is nothing wrong with the aggressiveness that expansion-to-statewide would demonstrate, especially since the expansion no doubt would save lives.

Neilson should rethink the scope of what he is planning to do.

Meanwhile, the Legislature should finally do what it should have done a long time ago: ban drivers’ use of hand-held cellphones while their vehicles are in operation.

Neighboring Maryland has that restriction in place. Pennsylvania should do the same.

Every motorist who enters Maryland via Route 220 in Bedford County, for example, is “greeted” with a sign indicating that hand-held cellphones are prohibited. There should be a similar sign on Pennsylvania’s side of the Mason-Dixon Line indicating that drivers’ use of hand-held cellphones is prohibited in this state as well.

The article published by Capitolwire, which focuses on issues impacted directly by actions at the state level, provided statistics emanating from the speed-cameras pilot program that has been operational in the Philadelphia area active work zones as well as on Philadelphia’s Roosevelt Boulevard for most of the past five years.

The most important statistic is that, through 2022, the state’s traffic speed cameras issued more than 1 million tickets, including almost 445,000 in 2022 alone.

Pennsylvania’s southern neighbor, Maryland, in addition to prohibiting held-held cellphones, has had a speed-camera program in effect for years.

Neilson’s proposed speed-camera expansion of inadequate scope, besides keeping what is currently in effect, would also authorize use of the cameras on roads throughout Philadelphia and only those school zones in Philadelphia.

School zones in other large metropolitan areas of the state – at least – should be accorded a similar camera-use option.

However, a commendable proposal under Neilson’s plan would OK use of stop-arm cameras on school buses statewide.

If that statewide stop-arm proposal gains legislative approval and the governor’s signature, the Legislature should provide monetary grants to school districts to purchase cameras for all of their buses.

It also would seem reasonable for the commonwealth, in order to initially obtain such cameras at a lower overall cost, to advertise for bids for the purchase of the cameras in bulk.

According to the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT), the speed cameras have been effective both in motorists driving at lower speeds and in reducing the number of crashes in work zones.

“The program has seen between a 15 to 50% reduction in the number of crashes when the unit is present versus when the unit is not present,” according to PennDOT’s annual report for the automated work-zone speed enforcement program.

Hopefully, area legislators will be active in speed camera and stop-arm discussions, going forward, as well as on the hand-held-cellphones-prohibition front.

Regarding those issues, many lives could be saved.

CUSTOMER LOGIN

If you have an account and are registered for online access, sign in with your email address and password below.

NEW CUSTOMERS/UNREGISTERED ACCOUNTS

Never been a subscriber and want to subscribe, click the Subscribe button below.

Starting at $3.75/week.

Subscribe Today